J. Michael Young J. Michael Young

North Carolina court denies interpleader relief

A decision out of North Carolina is a bit unusual. The court denied interpleader relief sought by a life insurance company. Also the life insurance company had paid a portion of the life insurance proceeds because of an incorrect view of Texas community property law.

Read More
J. Michael Young J. Michael Young

South Carolina court finds legitimate dispute regarding forgery claim

in Protective Life v. Henderson, a federal court in South Carolina considered a motion to dismiss the contest of a life insurance beneficiary designation. The court denied the motion, finding there was a legitimate dispute regarding whether the beneficiary designation was forged.

Read More
J. Michael Young J. Michael Young

Arkansas slayer Statute

Most states have prohibitions on a killer inheriting from the person that they killed or receiving life insurance or annuity benefits. They are commonly called slayer prohibitions. In Arkansas, the slayer statute is found at Code section 18- 4- 205.

Read More
J. Michael Young J. Michael Young

Oklahoma statute regarding designations of former spouses

Like many other states, Oklahoma has a statute automatically revoking beneficiary designations in favor of former spouses. It is broad and does not apply just to life insurance. It also applies to many kinds of death benefit designations, including annuities, retirement accounts, CDs, security registrations, and other benefits payable on death of the owner. In the event of divorce or annulment of the marriage, the decedent’s former spouse shall be treated for all purposes under the contract as having predeceased the decedent.

Read More
J. Michael Young J. Michael Young

Oklahoma court awards proceeds to children of first marriage

A federal court in Oklahoma recently issued a decision in a life insurance beneficiary dispute involving several issues we commonly see. First, the designation of a former spouse as the beneficiary. Second, the doctrine of substantial compliance in a dispute regarding whether the insured changed the beneficiaries of his life insurance policy.

Read More
J. Michael Young J. Michael Young

Federal court finds beneficiary designations the product of undue influence

A recent case out of federal court in Ohio is interesting because the federal judge overturned several ERISA beneficiary designations. The judge found that the insured had lacked mental capacity to execute two of the designations and also that the designations were the product of undue influence.

Undue influence claims are not easy to prove, so this case is particularly notable. The insured was a long time employee of General Motors. Through the company he had life insurance, which was part of an ERISA plan because he obtained it through his employer. Thee administrator was the life insurance company, Metlife.

Read More
J. Michael Young J. Michael Young

Settling life insurance beneficiary disputes involving Minors

Generally courts are thrilled when the parties settle the case the court doesn't really ask questions or second guess the settlement. But there is one important exception and that is when the settlement involves a minor. Courts want to protect the interests of a minor and in that situation the judge will often require that the parties obtain approval for the settlement.

Read More
J. Michael Young J. Michael Young

Georgia slayer statute

Like most other states, Georgia has a specific prohibition against a beneficiary receiving life insurance proceeds if they willfully kill the insured.

Read More
J. Michael Young J. Michael Young

Waiver of service of process in an interpleader suit

What is a waiver of service? When a life insurance company is on notice of a dispute regarding the proper beneficiary of life insurance proceeds, or is uncertain who to pay, it will often file an interpleader lawsuit. An interpleader is a type of lawsuit the life insurance company files to have a court determine who should receive the proceeds.

Read More